Example essay on benefits and drawbacks of Community Policing

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of this authors and never necessarily reflect the views of LawTeacher.

1. Explain community-policing. List the benefits and disadvantages of community policing. Detail the 2 most points that are important police agencies in utilizing this perspective.

Community Policing brings police and citizens together to stop crime and solve neighborhood problems. With community policing, the emphasis is on stopping crime before it happens, not responding to calls for service after the crime occurs. Community policing gives citizens more control within the well being inside their community. Community policing means police become part of the neighborhood. This helps police get a far better sense of resident’s needs and assists residents to build up greater trust in the police. In essence the grouped community joins the authorities department. Those “who believe that community policing is practiced inside their neighborhood are more inclined to express favorable opinions for the police.”(Weitzer & Tuch, 2006, p. 45) Together, in partnership, the city and police department work together to obtain a goal that is common of safer, better location to live. It is “democracy for action.”(BJA, August 1994, p. 4).

Community policing is seen as an way that is effective promote public safety and also to boost the standard of living in a residential area. Community policing plays a pivotal role in the two defining components of policing: police-community relations and problem-solving. “First, it must broaden police organization goals …Second, it will affect the way police are organized to perform their goals.” (Weisburd & Braga, 2007, p. 47) Active participation is required through the local government to the average citizen to allow community policing to work. Most people are accountable for safeguarding the welfare of the neighborhood. The goals of policing are expanded and the perception of community is changed unlike traditional policing methods. Traditional policing assumes that the problems of society are not inside the realm of law enforcement department. Traditional police departments are strictly reactive and don’t look beyond efficiently resolving the immediate incident at hand. Police officers are linked with the dispatcher and rarely have time to accomplish significantly more than answer one call after another. The authorities department, as a business, separates itself through the city’s infrastructure and from city services.

Implementing community policing changes the dwelling of policing and just how it is managed. Community policing helps build up and strengthen the community. Moreover it links law enforcement additionally the community together. The partnership that develops over time can help the police ultimately find the underlying causes of crime inside the neighborhood. By getting the grouped community involved, the police have significantly more resources available for them to simply help in crime prevention. By familiarizing themselves utilizing the people in the community, officers are more likely to obtain valuable details about criminals and their activities. Also they are prone to obtain a reliable evaluation of the needs of citizens and their expectations of the police.

As previously stated, community policing plays a major part in police-community relations and problem-solving. To be able to develop a partnership with the community, first the authorities must form a great relationship with the neighborhood. The authorities must make an effort to involve the area in its pursuit to regulate crime. Most community concerns and solutions are identified through problem-solving. The objective is always to to reduce crime and disorder by diligently examining the attributes of concerns in communities and then using the best suited problem-solving solutions.

With any method of policing there are going to be pros and cons. Among the main advantages to community policing is the fact that it reduces fear in the community. The residents feel more secure with an increase in police presence in the neighborhood. This sense of security helps the authorities establish trust in the community. As citizen become more active in taking care of their community, they start to know very well what officers really do on a day-to-day basis. This improves police-community relations. Ultimately, well being for the community improves and crime is reduced. An additional benefit is that grouped community policing is flexible and with the capacity of changing. The solutions and methods change since the community changes. If a plan works in one single community it doesn’t imply that it is going to work in all communities. Community policing allows the city to generate solutions that may work in their own neighborhood also to change or eliminate those that usually do not work. Community policing may be implemented in a limitless wide range of ways. This is also true of problem-solving. They both are just limited by one’s imagination. Community policing offers a myriad of benefits. Making effective utilization of the talents and resources available within communities will help extend severely strained police resources. Also, reduced degrees of crime will allow more police resources to be allotted to services which have the greatest impact from the quality of community life.

A disadvantage that is major that the only method that community policing is by using community involvement.

There must be a recognised partnership between your police officers additionally the community. Without having the trust and involvement of the community, any attempts at community policing will fail. “Police and there would-be partners do not always value the same, or even compatible, things” (Thacher, 2001, p. 766). Effective community policing requires a long-term my site commitment from everyone involved. It is not a quick fix. Ongoing relationships must be maintained and established. Another disadvantage to community policing is ensuring that the people that are right heading up the project. The focus must certanly be of enhancing the community and never utilizing the program to advance their particular personal career or agendas. Also, programs like community policing can be regressive. Oftentimes if you find an issue that needs help from the community it look like the people that are same step of progress. They are often the homeowners that have longstanding ties to the community. Community policing requires everyone’s involvement, not merely the home owners.

“Over ten years after it was first introduced, community policing remains the most innovation that is important American policing today.” (Forman, Autumn 2002, p. 1) some great benefits of implementing community policing still outweigh the disadvantages. Obtaining the grouped community on there side can only benefit the police in their aid to regulate and steer clear of crime. Also, with all the police more involved in the daily activities of the community will help with the revitalization for the community. This could easily only happen if both law enforcement together with community are prepared to put in the time, effort, and patience that is required when implementing the community policing program.

Dodaj komentarz

Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie opublikowany. Pola, których wypełnienie jest wymagane, są oznaczone symbolem *

Możesz użyć następujących tagów oraz atrybutów HTML-a: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>